The most seductive narrative in modern work culture isn’t that AI will steal your job—it’s that AI will save you from it. For the past three years, the tech industry has marketed AI as a “force multiplier” that would handle the grunt work, leaving humans to be more creative, strategic, and, crucially, less stressed. However, a new study published in Harvard Business Review suggests that this promise is leading us toward a “burnout paradox” rather than a productivity revolution.
The Reality of Augmented Work: More Tools, More Tasks
Researchers from UC Berkeley spent eight months observing a 200-person tech company to see what happens when employees genuinely embrace AI. Their findings challenge the “work smarter, not harder” utopian vision.
1. The Expansion of To-Do Lists The study found that when AI makes a task easier, workers don’t use the saved time to rest. Instead, their to-do lists expand to fill every liberated second. Because AI makes “more” feel doable, work has begun bleeding into lunch breaks and late evenings. As one engineer noted, you don’t work less; you simply work the same amount or even more to keep up with the new pace.
2. The Perception vs. Reality Gap This isn’t the first time AI’s efficiency has been questioned. Previous trials involving developers showed that while users felt 20% faster using AI, they actually took 19% longer on tasks due to the hidden costs of reviewing and debugging AI-generated content. We are increasingly mistaking the speed of generation for the speed of completion.
3. Escalating Organizational Expectations On industry forums like Hacker News, the sentiment is even more cynical. Employees report that as soon as AI tools are introduced, leadership expectations triple. The pressure to prove that expensive AI investments are “worth it” has created a high-stress environment where productivity gains are marginal (around 3–10%), but the mental toll is exponential.
Conclusion: From Efficiency to Exhaustion
The industry bet that helping people do more would be the ultimate solution. Instead, it may be the beginning of a systemic crisis. The “fatigue and burnout” identified by researchers stem from a rise in organizational expectations for speed and responsiveness that humans simply cannot sustain long-term.
AI can indeed augment what we do, but without deliberate boundaries and a redesign of “success” metrics, it serves only to accelerate the treadmill. To avoid becoming “burnout machines,” companies must shift their focus from using AI to squeeze out more volume to using AI to improve the quality of work-life balance.
Check out the best AI tools here! [Link coming soon]